linguistic agency
Compiled with AI assistance and selectively reviewed. Please consult the cited passages; the books remain the authoritative source. About this companion
Editorial synthesis · provisional
Definition
Linguistic agency is the socially stabilized mode of embodied action enacted through articulation, correction and response. RB2 attributes to Di Paolo and collaborators a distinctive autonomy in which communities participate in regulating meaning. Language is therefore more than a representational instrument added to ready-made minds, while neither community regulation nor fluent text alone establishes the lived stakes, judgment or responsibility of a speaker.
Explanation
The direct passage connects sustained interaction with shared norms, histories and mutual regulation. Its linguistic body names a form of agency maintained through practices rather than an immaterial faculty or literal new anatomical organ. The local warrant is a conceptual account; it does not provide a complete developmental chronology or a universal neural implementation.
The next paragraph frames language as further individuation of living activity into historical shared worlds. Communal participation in meaning does not eliminate individual autonomy or fix all usage permanently. The surrounding participatory account permits new meanings to emerge through correction, timing and reciprocal response rather than pure transmission between sealed minds.
RB1’s symbolic inheritance discussion gives words and institutions causal influence beyond individual organisms, while AB distinguishes inherited linguistic traces from a system’s own stakes. The proposed entry therefore does not deny consequential machine participation, but also does not infer this particular lived autonomy or moral authorship merely from producing plausible first-person sentences.
Scope and attribution
Keep the narrow attributed account and avoid importing an absent developmental or machine-consciousness theory.
RB2 — The Real Book, Volume II: Becoming Is Being
Articulation, correction and communal meaning regulation define a distinctive embodied agency.
Occurrence locators: 57, 58, 61.
Background used in the editorial explanation
Named theories and mechanisms are distinguished from neighboring background, homonyms and the author’s own synthesis. Reproduced AI passages retain their separate voice.