holographic principle

Compiled with AI assistance and selectively reviewed. Please consult the cited passages; the books remain the authoritative source. About this companion

Editorial synthesis · provisional

Definition

The holographic principle appears here through a transactional reinterpretation of screens and informational bookkeeping. In the Schlatter–Kastner program, the screen becomes the boundary between quantum possibility and emergent spacetime, with transactions contributing determinate information. The entry records this attributed use rather than claiming a complete general derivation of holography or treating every boundary and archive in the philosophical project as a literal holographic screen.

Explanation

The gravity discussion traces an information-and-entropy approach through Verlinde before introducing transactional microphysics. The screen marks an interpretive interface at which a possibility actualizes, rather than a material sheet placed inside an otherwise finished container. This local use should not be expanded into an unsupported technical account of every version of the holographic principle.

The associated information bookkeeping depends on the program’s physical assumptions. In particular, the manuscript flags the identification of information gain with thermodynamic entropy change as debated. A claim that an event supplies determinate information therefore does not by itself prove a gravitational law or validate the whole emergent-spacetime proposal.

PB’s letter recalls holographic ideas as part of the author’s intellectual journey, with a memory qualification, rather than furnishing independent physical confirmation. RB1 and RB2 mark the gravity extension as conjectural and unnecessary to the later philosophical conclusion. The proposed entry preserves these limits while retaining the screen’s specific role in the presented program.

Scope and attribution

Bound the definition to the corpus’s attributed transactional use.

PB — The Possible Book

Recalled holographic reading belongs to correspondence rather than empirical proof.

Occurrence locators: 136.

RB1 — The Real Book, Volume I: The Possible Is Real

The screen is reinterpreted as transactional interface and bookkeeping within a conjectural gravity program.

Occurrence locators: 94, 95.

Background used in the editorial explanation

Named theories and mechanisms are distinguished from neighboring background, homonyms and the author’s own synthesis. Reproduced AI passages retain their separate voice.